South Africa's dependence on coal-fired power plants for the bulk of its electricity has drawn concern from experts, who suggest that the government's vested interests are impeding the country's progress. The reliance on coal, primarily generated by plants in regions like Mpumalanga housing critical facilities such as Sasol’s Secunda plant, has raised critical voices, notably from the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER).

A recent report from the Daily Investor highlighted the struggle to transition to renewable energy sources, attributing this resistance to vested interests favoring coal. This assessment emerges in the wake of conflicting views, including EFF leader Julius Malema's staunch advocacy for preserving coal in Mpumalanga.

The CER criticized South Africa's Presidential Climate Commission for dismissing emissions reduction targets, attributing the lack of progress in renewable energy initiatives to the nation's entrenched interest in coal. Despite plans for the gradual closure of some coal-fired plants, recent reports indicate considerations to prolong the life of these facilities due to their crucial role in supplying 80% of the country's power, essential to avoid widespread power outages.

However, concerns persist as these plants, despite substantial investments, struggle to meet escalating electricity demands. The CER advocates for a comprehensive assessment of the cost and benefits of these coal-powered facilities throughout their operational lifespan.

Furthermore, the CER warns that South Africa's reluctance to shift toward renewable energy could limit access to future climate finance. The organization cautions against delaying the decommissioning of coal-fired plants and investing in carbon-intensive projects, emphasizing that these actions could impede the nation's progress in combating climate change.